Wednesday, March 7, 2018

Remote therapy

            The article that I chose to write my blog post on is Video Communication in Remote Rehabilitation and Occupational Therapy Groups. I chose this article because I thought that it would be interesting to see if virtual group meetings would be as productive as an in-person group meetings. 
            This article addresses some of the pros and cons of having group meetings online rather than in person.
·   Pros
o Safe/familiar environment may elicit further progress and be encouraging
o Improved communication skills
o Ease of access for those homebound or lacking transportation
·   Cons
o Technical problems/clients being unfamiliar with technology
o Materials need to sent to clients ahead of time (if necessary)
o No hands-on interaction with client

Some of the other things that this article addresses are that this study only consisted of 5-6 sessions so for groups with a longer time frame, the results may be less applicable. This study also mentions that the number of group members needed to smaller than in person. This could be a pro when it comes to getting a more one-on-one experience but a con for not being able to connect with as many people. The study also was a subjective study based on client’s opinion rather than being based on the impact of the therapy. Lastly the study emphasizes that remote rehabilitation does not and should not replace traditional face to face interactions.


I found this article to be very interesting. The idea of using technology as a means for group facilitation was something that I had previously thought about but was unsure how it would work and if it would be productive. From reading this article, I think that the idea of remote rehabilitation group meetings could be beneficial for certain populations. I can also see this being a great way to have group meetings between regularly scheduled face-to-face group meetings and/or therapy sessions. I think that this would be the best way to utilize this technique because it gives clients the therapeutic benefit of having the face-to-face meetings, while also having the ease and convenience of a using a remote way of therapy.  An example of how I think that this would work is an “on-site” meeting once a month and remote meetings every week. I feel like this is something that should be researched more to establish if it does produce a therapeutic benefit to the clients.


Reference:
Simil, H., Harjumaa, M., Isomursu, M., Ervasti, M., & Moilanen, H. (2014). Video communication in remote rehabilitation and occupational therapy groups. Physical & Occupational Therapy In Geriatrics32(2), 97-111. doi:10.3109/02703181.2014.919050